Controversial Rosebank Square, Salisbury Development Proposal Now Awaiting Construction

Rosebank Square, Salisbury Development Proposal Now Awaiting Construction
Photo credit: Brisbane City Council /

Tzu Chi Foundation’s proposed multi-use centre at 60 Rosebank Square, Salisbury, one of the most controversial development proposals of 2019, is now just awaiting construction schedule.

Before finally getting the green light in late October 2019, this development proposal went through pretty rough sailing, particularly strong opposition from locals residents. Since it was lodged in mid-January 2019, local residents have strongly opposed the development proposal over concerns of increased noise, congestion, rat-running, design not keeping with the neighbourhood’s character, and the size and height of the proposed building. 

The original proposal sought approval to establish a 3-storey childcare and community centre with a gross floor area of 1,810 sqm and will feature classrooms that will accommodate about 84 children, support facilities, performance area, a bookshop, meeting space, external play area, as well as 34 car parking spaces including one for PWD.

In early August 2019, the applicant submitted amended plans for their proposal, reducing the building’s height by removing the mezzanine level, the high-level roof overhanging the Rosebank Square, and the curved wall form to north-east and north-west boundary corners.

Photo credit: Brisbane City Council /

Local Resources

To further reduce its bulk and scale, the childcare centre has been further set back from the southern boundary and also re-oriented so that the east and west external walls are also set back from the eastern and western boundaries by 1,500 mm.

Tower Ad
Photo credit: Brisbane City Council /

Photo credit: Brisbane City Council /

The increased southern boundary setback will allow for deep planting to the south-east and south-west corners. Also, the recessed area on the north-east and north-west corners will also be allocated to deep planting in lieu of an awning.

Overall, the amended proposal reduced the GFA from1,810sqm to 1,065.3sqm; site cover from 96 percent to 84 percent; capacity of child care centre from 84 to 70 children; and the number of educational establishment rooms from eight to four.

Responding to other key issues raised by the community such as the cultural incompatibility or the development having no benefits to the local community, the applicant said that the “proposed building offers various activities which will serve the immediate local community.” 

The facilities, the developer said, such as the Bookshop with coffee station, Childcare Centre, and the Language school will be open to the public and members of the local community are also welcome to “join in any Tzu Chi Celebrations or become volunteers themselves.”

Photo credit: Brisbane City Council /

The Council reverted the assessment process from Impact Assessable to Code Assessable as a result of the amendments, which means that public notification is no longer required and residents will have no right to appeal the Council’s decision.

The changes to the proposal were not enough to allay public concerns, though. Many still believe that the alterations do not change the conditions that make it an unsuitable development in the area. The development application has had more than 200 submissions since it was lodged in January 2019.